Your software subscriptions are probably costing you more than you think. Not because software is expensive. Because you’re paying for software you have forgotten about, software that duplicates something else you already own, and software that four people are licensed to use and two of them left the business eighteen months ago.
This isn’t a technology problem. It’s a procurement problem. Like most procurement problems, it’s invisible until someone actually looks.
Australian businesses spent nearly A$13 billion on SaaS alone in 2025, a 15.5 per cent increase on the previous year, according to Gartner.1 That figure is dominated by enterprise and government spending. For small business, the individual number is much smaller. The proportional waste is not.
Globally, research consistently shows that between 25 and 34 per cent of SaaS licences in small businesses go unused or underused.2 Run that calculation on your own software stack and you’ll find the number.3
The pattern is consistent across Australian SMBs:4
This is what procurement professionals call SaaS sprawl. It’s one of the highest-return, lowest-effort problems a small business can fix. You’re not going without anything. You’re stopping payment for things that are not doing anything for you.5
Key Takeaway: SaaS waste isn’t a technology problem. It’s a visibility and process problem. You cannot manage what you cannot see.
The business owners I work with aren’t careless. They are busy, and SaaS vendors have designed their products to take advantage of exactly that.
Almost every SaaS product defaults to annual auto-renewal. The renewal lands on a credit card, no approval required, and the subscription continues for another twelve months. The vendor has no incentive to remind you to review whether you still need it.
No single SaaS subscription looks expensive. At $29 per month, or $59 per month, each tool clears the mental threshold most business owners set for scrutiny. The problem is that the average SMB now runs between 40 and 87 distinct software applications.6 Added together, the number stops looking small.
In most small businesses, software purchasing happens wherever it happens: the owner, the operations manager, the marketing coordinator, the sales lead. Each person solves their immediate problem. Nobody has a complete picture of what the business is paying for.7
Supplier contracts get reviewed. Lease agreements get reviewed. Insurance gets reviewed. Software subscriptions almost never get reviewed with the same rigour, because no one has been assigned to do it. In the absence of a process, the default is to renew.
Key Takeaway: SaaS sprawl is a structural problem, not a personal failing. Fix the structure: make software purchasing visible and assign someone to review it.
A SaaS audit does not require specialist software or an external consultant. It requires about half a day, a spreadsheet, and access to your bank and credit card statements.
The output is a software register: a single list of everything the business pays for, who owns it, what it costs annually, and when it renews. This is the procurement document most small businesses do not have and every small business needs.10
Key Takeaway: Build your software register once, then maintain it. Thirty days before renewal is your window. Use it.
If a tool has had no active users in ninety days, cancel it at the next renewal. No committee required. Unused software has no advocates. The cancellation conversation is almost never difficult.
If two tools in your stack do similar things, pick one and migrate. This is slightly more work but produces an immediate cost saving and a simpler operating environment. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace are the most common source of duplication: both offer email, document creation, video calls, and file storage. Running both is rarely necessary.
For tools you’re keeping, use the thirty-day window to renegotiate. If your usage has reduced, ask for a lower tier. If you’re a multi-year customer, ask for a loyalty rate. SaaS vendors have far more pricing flexibility than they advertise, particularly for customers who ask before the renewal rather than after.
The audit is not useful if the same problem recurs. Establish a simple rule: any new software subscription above a set threshold requires sign-off from one person before purchase. That person maintains the software register.11
Key Takeaway: Cancel what is unused. Consolidate what overlaps. Renegotiate what stays. Then add a purchasing rule to stop the sprawl from rebuilding.
Most business owners do not think of SaaS vendors as suppliers. They are. Each subscription is a commercial arrangement. Each renewal is a buying decision, and like any supplier relationship, it benefits from periodic review.
The difference between a software stack that works for the business and one that quietly drains it comes down to one thing: whether anyone is paying attention. Gartner has noted that many Australian organisations are already facing higher than expected cloud costs and complex management issues as their software portfolios grow.12 The correction available to a small business is straightforward. Run the audit. Build the register. Own the renewals.
You already paid for the software. You might as well get some of it back.
If you want a second set of eyes on your software stack before the next round of renewals, book a discovery call with D1 Advisory. No 47-slide deck. Just a straight conversation about what you are paying for and whether it is earning its place. You can reach us at www.d1advisory.business/book-a-call.
Before engaging any advisory firm, whether a large consultancy or a boutique specialist, ask four questions directly.
Payment terms are not the most glamorous part of commercial management. They sit in the background, rarely discussed, frequently assumed. But for a small business operating in an environment where large customers are consistently paying late and cash flow is the primary constraint on growth, they are one of the highest-leverage negotiation moves available.
Whatever procurement model a business chooses, the person or firm providing procurement support should have no commercial relationship with any supplier the business is buying from or considering. Kickback arrangements between procurement advisors and preferred suppliers are a structural conflict of interest that directly harms the buyer.